Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2011 DAILYLAW 4932 (MAD)

BABU v. M.RANGANATHAN

SA/1099/2011 · 2026-04-07

R Sakthivel

Transfer Petitionbody2011

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SA No. 1099 of 2011 __________ Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07.04.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SAKTHIVEL Second Appeal No.1099 of 2011 and Miscellaneous Petition No. 1 of 2014 1.Babu 2.Vijaya Babu Both are residing at No.9, 2nd Street, Kumarasamy Rajapuram, Demellows Road Chennai-12. Appellants/ Respondents/Defendants Versus M.Ranganathan No.10, 3rd Street, Kumarasamy, Rajapuram, Demellows Road Chennai-12. ..Respondent/ 1st Appellant/1st Plaintiff Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, praying to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated October 29, 2010 made in A.S.No. 661 of 2007 passed by the learned VI Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, by reversing the Judgment and Decree dated August 27, 2007 made in O.S.No. 3630 of 2006 passed by the learned VI Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis SA No. 1099 of 2011 __________ Page2 of 6 For Appellants: Mr. N.Sivaprakash JUDGMENT This Second Appeal has been filed praying to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated October 29, 2010 made in A.S.No. 661 of 2007 passed by the learned VI Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, by reversing the Judgment and Decree dated August 27, 2007 made in O.S.No. 3630 of 2006 passed by the learned VI Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. 2.Mr.N.Sivaprakash, Counsel on record for the Appellants is before this Court. 3.Mr.N.Sivaprakash, learned Counsel on record for the Appellants seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Second Appeal. To that effect, he has already filed a Memo dated March 30, 2026 along with a letter dated March 30, 2026 in the Registry from the Appellants. A scanned reproduction of those are as follows:- https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis SA No. 1099 of 2011 __________ Page3 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis SA No. 1099 of 2011 __________ Page4 of 6 4. In view of the above submission and memo, this Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition No.1 of 2014 is closed. 07.04.2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No MSM https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis SA No. 1099 of 2011 __________ Page5 of 6 To 1.The VI Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. 2.The VI Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. 3.The Section Officer, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis SA No. 1099 of 2011 __________ Page6 of 6 R.SAKTHIVEL, J. MSM SA No. 1099 of 2011 07.04.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis