Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2011 DAILYLAW 3000 (ALL)

CHANDRA MOL v. D.D.C. AND OTHERS

WRIB/46192/2011 · 2026-02-26

Dinesh Pathak

body2011

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 46192 of 2011 Court No. - 54 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. In Re: Civil Misc. Withdrawal Application No. 3 of 2026 1. Instant withdrawal application has been moved on behalf of the petitioner supported by affidavit of Akhilesh Kumar (nephew of the present petitioner) beseeching dismissal of the present writ petition as withdrawn. 2. Sri Vivek Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in changed scenario, the petitioner do not want to press instant writ petition, therefore, same may be dismissed as withdrawn. 3. There is no oppose to the prayer as made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Accordingly, withdrawal application is allowed. In Re: Writ Petition 5. In view of the order of the date, as above, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. February 27, 2026 vinay Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : A.K. Tiwari, V.K. Baranwal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Chandra Mol .....Petitioner(s) D.D.C. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad