IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 822 CWP-16529-2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 23.07.2026 NARESH KUMAR ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present : Mr. Rajender S. Rana, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. AG, Haryana. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Prayer made in the present petition is for quashing of promotion of respondent Nos.4 & 5 granted vide order dated 14.12.2009, might not be surviving due to efflux of time, especially in wake of there being no interim order. 2. Learned State counsel submits that neither the petitioner nor private respondents are in service. 3. Disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived by demonstrating that cause still subsists. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) 23.07.2026 JUDGE ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No ASHOK KUMAR 2026.07.23 19:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document