VINAY KAURA v. UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD AND ORS
CWP/20552/2011 · 2026-07-24
Aman Chaudhary
body2011
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2011 DAILYLAW 2458 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2011 DAILYLAW 2458 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 834
CWP-20552-2011 (O&M)
Date of decision: 24.07.2026 VINAY KAURA
... Petitioner
Versus UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD AND ORS
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present : None.
**** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral)
1.
Prayer made in the present petition is for quashing orders dated 16.11.2009 and 23.11.2010, Annexures P9 & P13, by which respondent No.3 has been promoted to the post of Dy. Superintendent and Superintendent, might not be surviving due to efflux of time, especially in absence of interim order having been passed.
2.
Disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived by demonstrating that cause still subsists.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) 24.07.2026
JUDGE ashok
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable
: Yes/No ASHOK KUMAR 2026.07.24 15:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document