ASHOK KUMAR PARMAR & ANR. v. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.
CWP/2698/2011 · 2026-07-22
Aman Chaudhary
body2011
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2011 DAILYLAW 2431 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2011 DAILYLAW 2431 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 775 CWP-2698-2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 22.07.2026 Ashok Kumar Parmar and Another ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and Others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present : None for the petitioners Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. AG, Haryana Mr. Anil Chawla, Advocate for respondent No.2 ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL)
1. Prayer made in the present petition for quashing of impugned order dated 14.10.2010 for not promoting the petitioners under 4% quota made available vide office order dated 22.08.1979, might not be surviving, due to efflux of time.
2.
Learned counsel for respondent No.2 while referring to the para 3 of the written statement stated that the 4% quota remain in existence till 19.02.1988, when the rules were amended and benefit could not have been granted to employees thereafter, to which, there is no rebuttal by way of filing any replication.
3.
Disposed of, reserving the petitioners with a liberty to get it revived by demonstrating that the cause still subsists.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY)
JUDGE 22.07.2026 M.Kamra Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No MOHIT 2026.07.22 17:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document