D.P.RATTAN v. STATE OF HARYANA THRU FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER
CWP/11479/2011 · 2026-07-22
Aman Chaudhary
body2011
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2011 DAILYLAW 2430 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2011 DAILYLAW 2430 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 799 CWP-11479-2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 22.07.2026 D.P. Rattan ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana through Financial Commissioner
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present : None for the petitioner Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. AG, Haryana ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL)
1. Learned State counsel refers to preliminary objection No.1 of the reply filed on behalf of respondent No.2, as per which the present petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as such on account of the fact that the recommendations of Anomaly Committee were approved by the Board of Administrators of Hafed in its meeting held on 29.07.2011 vide Agenda No.15 and it was resolved to pormote the petitioner to the post of Chief General Manager (Proc. & WH). Accordingly, he was promoted on 01.08.2011 and joined the promotional post on the same day.
2.
Disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to approach the respondents, in case any grievance still subsists.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY)
JUDGE 22.07.2026 M.Kamra Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No MOHIT 2026.07.22 17:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document