CRA-S-2011-2026 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRA-S-2011-2026 Date of decision: 15.06.2026 Rajbir ...Appellant Versus State of Haryana and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present: Mr. Chander Pal Tiwana, Advocate for the appellant. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Appellant prays for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.723 dated 10.10.2024, under Sec3ons 115(2), 127(2), 190, 191(2), (r), 3(1) (s) and 3(2) (Va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Preven3on of Atroci3es) Act, 1989, registered at Police Sta3on Barwala, District Hisar. 2. FIR was lodged on the complaint of Ompal, as per which he along with others was engaged as a labourer by Contractor Sa3sh Jangra along with pe33oner Rajbir and others. When a=er conclusion of the work they asked for their wages, Sa3sh Jangra and his other accomplices assaulted the complainant and his labour friends, locked them in a room, confined them for the whole night and asked them for extor3on money of ₹5,00,000/- anyone threatened to kill the complainant and his friends. 3. It is contended by learned counsel that the pe33oner has been falsely implicated and that allega3ons are against Sa3sh Jangra; that co- accused Sa3sh Jangra, Sewa Singh, Satbir Singh and Basau have already been allowed regular bail by the trial Court from 3me to 3me. 4. No3ce of mo3on. 5. Sh. Abhinav Mahant, AAG, Haryana, accepts no3ce on behalf of YOGESH MEHTA 2026.06.15 17:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRA-S-2011-2026 [2] the State. Learned State counsel opposes the pe33on on the ground that extor3on money was asked for through the mobile of the pe33oner and an amount of Rs.5,000/- was found to have been deposited in his bank account. However, it is not disputed by him that the co-accused have since been allowed bail. It is further informed by learned State counsel that pe33oner is in custody since 26.03.2026 i.e. for the last almost 80 days. It is also informed by learned State counsel that challan has already been filed a=er conclusion of inves3ga3on. 6. Having regard to all the aforesaid facts and circumstances, but without commen3ng anything upon the merits of the case, the pe33oner is admiFed to regular bail and he is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds and surety bonds to the sa3sfac3on of the learned Trial Court concerned, on usual terms and condi3ons. 7. Allowed. 15.06.2026 (DEEPAK GUPTA) Yogesh JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No YOGESH MEHTA 2026.06.15 17:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document