139-3 IN TH Ram Kishan State of Har CORAM: Present: HARKESH present app passed by RFA No. and anoth landowners [2] appellant(s) factual posit [3] case (supr agrees with [4] same terms [5] stand(s) dis
March 25 ‘dk kamra’

 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR RFA Date ishan and another Versus of Haryana and another HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HAR Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Sr. Advocate Mr. Lavish, Advocate, for the Mr. Abhinash Jain, Deputy Adv for the respondents. **** KESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) At the outset, learned State nt appeal is squarely covered by the j d by this Court in a bunch of appea o. 3925 of 2011, titled “Narinder other”, whereby the appeals pre wners were dismissed. On the other hand, learned lant(s)-landowner(s) is not in a positi l position. After going through the judgm supra) as well as the facts of the s with the assertion of the learned cou Consequently, the present a terms as Narinder’s case (supra). Pending miscellaneous app (s) disposed off. h 25, 2026        UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH RFA No. 4306 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 25.03.2026 ...Appellants ...Respondents HARKESH MANUJA vocate, assisted by the appellants. Advocate General, Haryana State Counsel submits that the y the judgment dated 09.02.2012 ppeals, lead case of which was der Versus State of Haryana ls preferred at the instance of earned Senior Counsel for the position to controvert the above judgment passed in Narinder’s of the present case, this Court ed counsel for the respondents. ent appeal is dismissed in the . s application(s), if any, shall ( HARKESH MANUJA ) JUDGE
  DINESH KUMAR 2026.03.27 18:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document