139-6 IN TH Brij Mohan The State o CORAM: Present: HARKESH the presen 26.05.2011 which was another Ve preferred a dismissed, w Court. [2] position to c [3] case (supra with the ass [4] same terms [5] disposed off
March 25 ‘dk kamra’

 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR RFA Date ohan Versus tate of Haryana and another HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HAR Ms. Kajal Verma, Advocate for Mr. Ashok Kumar Verma, Advo for the appellant. Mr. Abhinash Jain, Deputy Adv for the respondents. **** KESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) At the outset, learned counsel f resent appeal is squarely covered 2011 passed by this Court in a bunc was RFA No. 3036 of 2011, titled Versus Brij Mohan and othe red at the instance of respondent , while affirming the award passe On the other hand, learned n to controvert the above factual positi After going through the judgm upra) as well as the facts of the pres e assertion of the learned counsel for Consequently, the present ap terms as Brij Mohan’s case (supra) Pending miscellaneous applica ed off. h 25, 2026        UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH RFA No. 6766 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 25.03.2026 ...Appellant ...Respondents HARKESH MANUJA te for , Advocate, Advocate General, Haryana nsel for the appellant submits that vered by the judgment dated bunch of appeals, lead case of , titled “State of Haryana and thers”, whereby the appeals ndents-State of Haryana were passed by the learned Reference rned State Counsel is not in a l position. judgment passed in Brij Mohan’s present case, this Court agrees el for the appellant. nt appeal is disposed off in the ra). pplication(s), if any, shall stand(s) ( HARKESH MANUJA ) JUDGE
  DINESH KUMAR 2026.03.27 18:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document