604 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-1798-2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 29.04.2026 Executive Engineer, Haryana Urban Development Authority and others ......Appellants Vs. Zile Singh and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: None for the appellants. None for respondent No.1. Mr. Ram Karan Sharma, DAG, Haryana, for respondent No.2. **** SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. (ORAL) 1. This case pertains to the year 2011. None had put in appearance on behalf of the appellants as well as contesting respondent No.1 since 18.07.2025, therefore, on the last date of hearing, Registry was directed to issue notice to the appellants as well as contesting respondent No.1 as well as their counsel for the date fixed. 2. As per office report, notice issued to the appellants has been received back served and notice issued to respondent No.1 has been received back unserved for want of complete address and learned counsel for the appellants has been informed through letter. 3. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants as well as respondent No.1. 4. In view of the above, this Court is now left with no other option but to dismiss the present appeal for want of prosecution. VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2026.05.02 13:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 604 5. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. 6. Liberty is, however, reserved to the appellants to move an application to revive the present appeal in case any cause of action survives. 7. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE 29.04.2026 Virender Whether speaking/non-speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2026.05.02 13:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document