IN TH 230 Sanjay Gu Sh. Harp Gobindgar another CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU wilful diso 21.01.2011 a Division Gupta and dated 14.05 titled “San whereby th accumulate attention o COCP-5201-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.5201 o Date of decision ay Gupta Versus Harpreet Singh, President, Mu indgarh, Tehsil amloh, District Fate AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Ms. Divya Arora, Advocate fo Mr. Aditya Grover, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. D.S. Randhawa, Advocate HI GUPTA J. (Oral) The present contempt petitio l disobedience of the orders dated 1 1.2011 (Annexure P-2) and 17.11.2011 vision Bench of this Court in CWP and others vs. State of Punjab and 14.05.2012 (Annexure P-4) passed Sanjay Gupta and others vs. Dhar eby the respondents were directed to mulated at the site in question. Learned counsel for the res tion of this Court to the reply dated 0 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 5201 of 2025 (O & M) cision :-04.05.2026 …..Petitioner , Municipal Council, Mandi t Fatehgarh Sahib, Punjab and …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA cate for ocate vocate for the respondents. petition has been filed alleging ated 19.11.2010 (Annexure P-1), 1.2011 (Annexure P-3) passed by CWP-15362-2010 titled “Sanjay and others”, as well as order assed in COCP No.741 of 2011 haram Pal Rao and another”, ted to ensure that no garbage is he respondents has invited the ated 09.02.2026 filed by way of VIJAY ASIJA 2026.05.04 18.49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document affidavit o Council, G submitted complied w support of photograph Clinic/Moh Departmen 15 TPD ca which effe strength of of contemp the record. the orders From the m behalf of emerges th preventing There is n disobedienc COCP-5201-2025 (O & M) t of Shri Chetan Sharma, Exec cil, Gobindgarh, District Fatehgarh Sa itted that the directions issued by t lied with and no garbage is lying a ort of the said submission, reliance ographs annexed as Annexure R-1. It has further been submitted c/Mohalla Clinic is being run at rtment, Government of Punjab, and PD capacity (Bio-Gas Plant) has al h effectively addresses the issue of w gth of these developments, learned co ntempt is made out. I have heard learned counsel ecord. Contempt jurisdiction is invok rders passed by the Court and not to the material placed on record, partic lf of the respondents along with s ges that the directions issued by t enting accumulation of garbage at the e is nothing on record to indicate edience of the orders passed by this C 2 , Executive Officer, Municipal arh Sahib, placed on record. It is d by this Court have been duly ying accumulated at the site. In iance has been placed upon the itted that presently Aam Aadmi un at the site by the Health nd a Biomethanation Plant of has also been established there, e of waste management. On the ned counsel submits that no case unsel for the parties and perused invoked to ensure compliance of not to adjudicate fresh disputes. particularly the affidavit filed on with supporting photographs, it by this Court with regard to at the site stand complied with. dicate any wilful or deliberate this Court. VIJAY ASIJA 2026.05.04 18.49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document ground for out. and the rule of. May 04, 20 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo COCP-5201-2025 (O & M) In view of the above, this nd for proceeding further in the presen Accordingly, the present conte he rule issued against the respondents Pending application(s), if any , 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 3 this Court is satisfied that no present contempt petition is made t contempt petition is disposed of dents is discharged. if any, shall also stand disposed ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.05.04 18.49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document