SARUP SINGH v. PEPSU ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION PTL AND ORS
RSA/2145/2011 · 2026-04-30
Sudeepti Sharma
body2011
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2011 DAILYLAW 2291 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2011 DAILYLAW 2291 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
RSA-2145-2011 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 613 RSA-2145-2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 30.04.2026 SARUP SINGH
......Appellant Vs.
PEPSU ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION PATIALA AND ORS .....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: None for the appellant. Mr. Anupam Singla, Advocate, for the respondents.
SUDEEPTI SHARMA
J. (Oral)
1. On the last date of hearing, Registry was directed to issue notice to the appellant as well as his counsel.
2. As per report of Registry, appellant has been duly served.
Learned counsel for the appellant has been informed through E-mail.
3. Despite notice, none has appeared for the appellant.
4. In view of the same, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the present appeal for non-prosecution.
5. Dismissed for non-prosecution.
6. All pending Misc. application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. 30.04.2026 (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) P. Seth
JUDGE
Whether speaking/non-speaking : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No POONAM RANI 2026.05.01 15:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document