228 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR-1188-2011 Date of Decision: 23.04.2026 Bansi Lal …Petitioner vs. State of Punjab …Respondent Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. Dinesh Maurya, Advocate for Mr. G.S.Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Charanpreet Singh, AAG, Punjab. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned State counsel submit that the petitioner has expired and the present petition has been rendered infructuous. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Pending application, if any, stands also disposed of. (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 23.04.2026 JUDGE hemlata Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HEMLATA 2026.04.23 22:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document