CWP-8566-2011 with connected cases IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 210 1. CWP-8566 SUSHMA AND OTHERS STATE OF HARYANA 2. CWP-7309 MEENA RANI STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 3. CWP-7291 RAJESH KUMAR STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present:- Mr. Shilak Ram Hooda, Advocate with Mr. R. K. Chauhan, Advocate Mr. Aakash Singla, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA The directing the respondents to explain of Article 335 Faculty teaching staf Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Backward candidates have not been has been sought directing the respondents to appoint the 2011 with connected cases -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 8566-2011 SUSHMA AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 7309-2009 MEENA RANI AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 7291-2009 RAJESH KUMAR AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Shilak Ram Hooda, Advocate with Mr. R. K. Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Aakash Singla, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) These petitions have been filed seeking a writ of directing the respondents to explain why they have not followed 335 of the Constitution of India in making appointment Faculty teaching staff in schools all over the State of Haryana, since Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Backward have not been given their due share has been sought directing the respondents to appoint the IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 21.04.2026 …Petitioner(s) …Respondent(s) …Petitioner(s) …Respondent(s) …Petitioner(s) …Respondent(s) TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Shilak Ram Hooda, Advocate with for the petitioner(s). Mr. Aakash Singla, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. seeking a writ of quo warranto why they have not followed the mandate of the Constitution of India in making appointment of Guest all over the State of Haryana, since Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Backward Class reserved category share. Further, a writ of mandamus has been sought directing the respondents to appoint the petitioners, who quo warranto the mandate Guest all over the State of Haryana, since category mandamus , who Aman Dua 2026.04.28 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document CWP-8566-2011 with connected cases belong to the reserved category illegally ignored. 2. Learned State cou Faculty teaching staff arrangement in terms of criteria and procedure laid down vide letter dated 18/27.09.2006, Annexure P mentioned in the written statement sent requisition to the posts of Lecturers (School cadre), 2976 posts of Masters and 9647 posts of JBT Teachers on regular basis purpose, and regular appointments reserved category 3. Considering the submissions, this Court is not inclined entertain the petition; firstly, issued to call for an the petitioners Faculty Teachers were appointed respondents duly Commission by following the reservation Policy 4. Accordingly, the petitions stand d 5. A photocopy of this order be placed on the connected file 21.04.2026 Ad 2011 with connected cases -2- belong to the reserved category, as Guest Faculty illegally ignored. Learned State counsel submitted Faculty teaching staff was made in the Government School arrangement in terms of criteria and procedure laid down vide letter dated 18/27.09.2006, Annexure P-5, which is not under challenge. mentioned in the written statement filed in CWP requisition to the recruiting agency/Commission for filling up of posts of Lecturers (School cadre), 2976 posts of Masters and 9647 posts of JBT Teachers on regular basis. The Commission regular appointments were made by reserved category candidates in terms of the Government Policy. Considering the submissions, this Court is not inclined entertain the petition; firstly, because the writ of for an explanation from the respondents the petitioners; secondly, because it is not Faculty Teachers were appointed as a stop duly initiated the process to fill by following the reservation Policy Accordingly, the petitions stand d A photocopy of this order be placed on the connected file Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable as Guest Faculty Teachers as they have been ted that the appointment of Guest was made in the Government Schools as a stop-gap arrangement in terms of criteria and procedure laid down vide letter dated , which is not under challenge. Besides, as filed in CWP-7291-2009, the Department Commission for filling up of 1503 posts of Lecturers (School cadre), 2976 posts of Masters and 9647 posts of Commission issued advertisements for the made by giving due reservation to candidates in terms of the Government Policy. Considering the submissions, this Court is not inclined to writ of quo warranto cannot be explanation from the respondents, as has been sought by it is not in dispute that the said Guest stop-gap arrangement, and the the process to fill regular vacancies through the by following the reservation Policy. Accordingly, the petitions stand dismissed. A photocopy of this order be placed on the connected files. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No as they have been that the appointment of Guest gap arrangement in terms of criteria and procedure laid down vide letter dated Besides, as , the Department 1503 posts of Lecturers (School cadre), 2976 posts of Masters and 9647 posts of for the giving due reservation to to cannot be as has been sought by Guest and the through the ) Aman Dua 2026.04.28 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document