324.11CP 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 902 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 324 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4383 OF 2007 SADASHIVRAO VITHALRAO AHER VERSUS S.J.KOCHE & OTHERS ... AGP for Respondent-State : Mr.A.S.Shinde Advocate for Respondent no.2 : Mr.P.P.Dama ... CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ. DATE : 10.09.2026 ORDER : [PER : VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.] 1] In the order under contempt, the directions were given to pay rental compensation. 2] The respondent no. 1 Collector has filed affidavit- in-reply wherein it is stated that in the award under Section 11 of the Land Acquisition Act, compensation is paid under Section 23 and 34 of the Land Acquisition Act. Therefore, the present petitioner is not entitled to get again rental compensation as per the Government Resolutions. 2026:BHC-AUG:42238 324.11CP 2 3] Otherwise also, the petition is not circulated after 2011. It seems that due to passage of time, the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the contempt petition. 4] In view of the same, the Contempt Petition is disposed of. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE] JUDGE JUDGE DDC