22-ABA-2011-2026.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2011 OF 2026 Shankar Eknath Sutar …Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra …Respondent Mr. Ghansham Jadhav, for the Applicant. Mr. Shahaji Shinde, ‘B’ Panel Counsel a/w. Mr. S. G. Ghag, APP, for the Respondent-State. CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED : 7th SEPTEMBER 2026 PC:- 1. At the outset, Mr. Shinde, learned ‘B’ Panel Counsel states that although there are four antecedents against the Applicant, no details have been mentioned in the Anticipatory Bail Application, except stating that there are antecedents. 2. In view of the above contention, Mr. Jadhav, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant seeks withdrawal of the Anticipatory Bail Application with liberty to file a fresh Anticipatory Bail Application by giving all the details of the antecedents against the Applicant. Page 1 Sonali SONALI MILIND PATIL Digitally signed by SONALI MILIND PATIL Date: 2026.09.09 10:59:03 +0530 22-ABA-2011-2026.DOC 3. Accordingly, the Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as such by granting liberty as sought. 4. It is clarified that this Court has not considered the merits and all contentions on merits are expressly kept open. [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] Page 2 Sonali