Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2011 DAILYLAW 1689 (BOM)

BHAUSAHEB S/O. SARJERAO KALE (PATIL) v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

WP/2011/2019 · 2026-08-20

body2011

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

914 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2011 OF 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 914 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2011 OF 2019 Bhausaheb Sarjerao Kale (Patil) VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others __________________________________________________________ Adv. Ms. A. V. Sagar h/f. Adv. Prakash S. Paranjape for the Petitioner Mr. N. B. Patil, APP for State Mr. S. B. Solanke for the Petitioner Kishor A. Deshmukh in Cr.Appln./275/2020 __________________________________________________________ WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 275 OF 2020 IN WP/2011/2019 ... CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 20, 2026 PER COURT : 1) None for the petitioner. 2) The petitioner seeks direction in this petition for registration of an offence against the then Tahsildar, Paithan, Kishor Deshmukh, for misappropriation of Government funds. 3) The learned A.P.P., on instructions, submits that a departmental enquiry was conducted against the Komal Kamble Page|1 of 2 2026:BHC-AUG:38980-DB 914 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2011 OF 2019 said Tahsildar and that his one increment was stopped for one year. 4) However, the petition seeks a direction for registration of an offence against him and, for that purpose, the Petitioner may take recourse to Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. 5) As the Petitioner has an alternate remedy, we are not inclined to grant any relief in this petition. Accordingly, the Criminal Writ Petition, therefore, stands disposed of along with the pending application, if any. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE JUDGE Komal Kamble Page|2 of 2