SOU. VIJAYASHRI MAHENDRA JAGTAP v. KURDUWADI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL KURDUWADI THR. CHIEF OFFICER AND ORS
IA/10082/2025 · 2026-08-14
body2011
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2011 DAILYLAW 1666 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2011 DAILYLAW 1666 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
30-WP-9747-2011.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9747 OF 2011 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 10082 OF 2025 Vijayashri Mahendra Jagtap ...Petitioner. Versus Kurduwadi Municipal Council, Kurduwadi and Others ...Respondents. —————— Mr. S. G. Kudle (Through VC) with Mr. Q. H. Kudle & Mr. Kishor Jadhav, for the Petitioner. Mr. V. M. Mali, AGP, for the Respondent Nos.3 & 4-State. Mr. Dilip Bodake with Mr. Amar P. Dhumal, for the Respondent No.5. ——————
Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh & Neeraj P. Dhote, JJ. Date : August 14, 2026.
P. C. :
1. The learned counsel appearing for the Respondent No.5 submits that the Respondent No.5 has already expired on 30th June 2025. He would further point out the prayer clause (b) of the petition seeking a declaration that the Petitioner is senior to the Respondent No.5.
2. As the issue of inter se seniority between the Petitioner and Respondent No.5 does not survive for consideration, the petition is
disposed of as infructuous.
3. It is open for the Petitioner to adopt appropriate remedy, in event the Petitioner’s services are not considered for the post of Headmistress, despite the demise of Respondent No.5. Gaikwad RD 1 of
2
30-WP-9747-2011.doc
4. In view of disposal of Writ Petition, the Interim Application does not survive and stands disposed of. [Neeraj P. Dhote, J.] [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.] Gaikwad RD 2 of
2 RAJU DATTATRAYA GAIKWAD Digitally signed by RAJU DATTATRAYA GAIKWAD Date: 2026.08.15 10:32:12 +0530