GODAVARI MARATHWADA IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. v. MADHUKAR PEERAJI SOLANKE AND ANR
CA/8103/2011 · 2026-07-07
Shri Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
body2011
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2011 DAILYLAW 1654 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2011 DAILYLAW 1654 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CA 8118/11 & Ors. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 41 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8118 OF 2011 IN FAST/12119/2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8098 OF 2011 IN FAST/12408/2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8085 OF 2011 IN FAST/12387/2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8110 OF 2011 IN FAST/12429/2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8111 OF 2011 IN FAST/12429/2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8112 OF 2011 IN FAST/12429/2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8088 OF 2011 IN FAST/12402/2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8089 OF 2011 IN FAST/12402/2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8093 OF 2011 IN FAST/12435/2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8094 OF 2011 IN FAST/12397/2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8099 OF 2011 IN FAST/12408/2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8100 OF 2011 IN FAST/12419/2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8109 OF 2011 IN FAST/12413/2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8090 OF 2011 IN FAST/12402/2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8114 OF 2011 IN FAST/12392/2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8086 OF 2011 IN FAST/12387/2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8087 OF 2011 IN FAST/12387/2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8097 OF 2011 IN FAST/12408/2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8102 OF 2011 IN FAST/12419/2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8092 OF 2011 IN FAST/12435/2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8103 OF 2011 IN FAST/12424/2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8104 OF 2011 IN FAST/12424/2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8105 OF 2011 IN FAST/12424/2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8107 OF 2011 IN FAST/12413/2011 WITH 2026:BHC-AUG:27122
CA 8118/11 & Ors. 2 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8091 OF 2011 IN FAST/12435/2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8096 OF 2011 IN FAST/12397/2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8108 OF 2011 IN FAST/12413/2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8095 OF 2011 IN FAST/12397/2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8113 OF 2011 IN FAST/12392/2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8116 OF 2011 IN FAST/12119/2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8117 OF 2011 IN FAST/12119/2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8101 OF 2011 IN FAST/12419/2011 GODAVARI MARATHWADA IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD VERSUS ANGAD VYANKATRAO SOLANKE AND ANR … Advocate for applicants/appellants : Mr. Sambhaji S. Tope AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. D.R. Korde ...
CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. Dated : July 07, 2026 PER COURT :-
1. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellants and Mr. D.R. Korde, learned AGP for State.
2. In civil applications filed for delay condonation, for the reasons stated in the applications, the applications are allowed. Delay is condoned.
3. By these appeals, the Appellants assail the Judgment and award dated 2.5.2009 passed by the learned Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division, Ahmedpur in L.A.R. No.160 of 2007 and other connected matters arising out of same acquisition proceedings.
4. Mr. D.R. Korde, learned AGP submits that the SLAO has granted compensation at the rate of Rs.79/- per Sq. mtrs. and the reference court has enhanced the same at the rate of Rs. 89/- per Sq. Mtrs. He therefore,
CA 8118/11 & Ors. 3 submits that the compensation enhanced by the learned Reference Court does not exceed four times the amount awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer.
5. In view of the aforesaid submissions and having regard to the policy decision of the State Government contained in Government Resolution No.Sankirna-2014/Prak.Kra.4/Bham-1/A-4 dated 03.11.2016 with Corrigendum dated 23.02.2017 and 13.08.2018 to the said Government Resolution, took a decision not to challenge the reference, if compensation is enhanced only upto four times.
6. Therefore, I do not find any reason to intervene with the impugned
order. Hence, the present Appeals are dismissed.
7. The Claimants are at liberty to withdraw the amount deposited by the State/acquiring body before the learned Reference Court, if any.
8. In view of dismissal of the Appeals, pending Civil Applications, if any, do not survive and are disposed of accordingly.
( SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. ) ssc/