GMIDC THROUGH EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION PARBHANI AND ANR v. TULSIRAM VYANKOBA JOGDAND DIED TH LR VYANKOBA TULSIRAM JOGDAND AND ORS
CA/2980/2011 · 2026-07-10
Shri Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
body2011
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2011 DAILYLAW 1619 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2011 DAILYLAW 1619 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
919-CA-2980-2011.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 919 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2980 OF 2011 IN FAST/3929/2011 Gmidc Through Executive Engineer Minor Irrigation Division Parbhani And Anr VERSUS Tulsiram Vyankoba Jogdand Died Th Lr Vyankoba Tulsiram Jogdand And Ors WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2979 OF 2011 IN FAST/3929/2011 Gmidc Through Executive Engineer Minor Irrigation Division Parbhani And Anr VERSUS Tulsiram Vyankoba Jogdand Died Th Lr Vyankoba Tulsiram Jogdand And Ors WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9537 OF 2018 IN FAST/3929/2011 Tulsiram Vyankoba Jogdand (died) Th Lr Vyankoba Tulsiram Jogdand And Ors VERSUS Gmidc Through Executive Engineer Minor Irrigation Division Parbhani And Ors
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2981 OF 2011 IN FAST/3929/2011 Gmidc Through Executive Engineer Minor Irrigation Division Parbhani And Anr VERSUS Tulsiram Vyankoba Jogdand Died Th Lr Vyankoba Tulsiram Jogdand And Ors WITH FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 3929 OF 2011 Gmidc Through Executive Engineer Minor Irrigation Division Parbhani And Anr VERSUS Tulsiram Vyankoba Jogdand Died Th Lr Vyankoba Tulsiram Jogdand And Ors Shubham 2026:BHC-AUG:30746
919-CA-2980-2011.doc ----- Mr. Shirish Sangle for the Applicant in CA/2980/2011, CA/2979/2011, CA/2981/2011. Mr. Bade Patil K. D. for the Applicant in CA/9537/2018 Mr. S. S. Dande, AGP for State. ----- CORAM :
SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
DATE :
10 JULY 2026 P. C.:
1. There is delay of 57 days in preferring First Appeal. Considering the averments made in the Civil Application, the Civil Application is allowed. 2. Both the learned counsel submit that the issue involved in the present Appeal is squarely covered by order passed by this Court in First Appeal No.3500 of 2008 with other connected matters decided on 14th July 2018 in National Lok Adalat. 3. As this Court has taken a view in First Appeal No.3500 of 2008 arising out of the same project, I am inclined to adopt the same view. Hence, present First Appeal stands disposed of in view of the order passed in First Appeal No.3500 of 2008, paragraph No.6 of which reads as under:-
“6. So far as the cross appeals/objections preferred by the respondents- original claimants are concerned, learned counsel appearing for the respondents-original claimants, on instructions, submits that the respondents-claimants who have preferred cross appeals/objections are ready to settle the matters amicably in the event if their claim for enhancement of compensation amount is considered by the acquiring body @ Rs.1,20,000/- per Hector.
Learned counsel appearing for acquiring body, on instructions, submits that the said proposal would be considered and the Shubham
919-CA-2980-2011.doc cross-appeals / objections be placed in the next Lok Adalat. In view of above, cross-appeals / objections be placed in the Next Lok Adalat.”
4. Pending Civil Applications, if any, stand disposed of. [SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.] Shubham