P. Bala Gurappa, v. SRI K. JAYA BARATHI REDDY,Commissioner,
CC/1568/2011 · 2026-06-15
Harinath N
body2011
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2011 DAILYLAW 1272 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2011 DAILYLAW 1272 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HN, J C.C.No.1568_2011 APHC010215172011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1568/2011 Between:
1. P. BALA GURAPPA,, S/O. P. GURAPPA, RETIRED INSPECTOR OF POLICE, R/O. D.NO. 6-5-462, VENKAT RAO NAGAR, ANANTHAPUR, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. SRI K JAYA BARATHI REDDY COMMISSIONER, TADIPATRI MUNICIPALITY, TADIPATRI, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT.
2. SRI D CHENNA KRISHNA REDDY, DY. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER ROADS AND BUILDINGS DEPARTMENT TADIPATRI , ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT
3. SRI G VENKATA SUBBAIAH, ASST EXECUTIVE ENGINEER ROADS AND BUILDINGS DEPARTMENT 4TH ZONE TADIPATRI, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to Pleased to punish the respondents under section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for willfully and deliberately disobeying the order of this Hon'ble Court passed in W.P.M.P No. 21379 of 2010 in W.P No. 16945 of 2010 dated 16/7/2010 and pass.
IA NO: 1 OF 2011(APPL 384 OF 2011
HN, J C.C.No.1568_2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to grant leave to the petitioner to implead the respondent 2 and 3 as parties to the above contempt case and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. TURAGA SAI SURYA Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS
2. MD SALEEM (SC-MC,RSEEMA,SPSR NLR)
3. K NARSI REDDY
HN, J C.C.No.1568_2011 ORDER:
1. The present contempt case is filed alleging non-compliance with the orders passed in the writ petition.
2. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the writ petition has already been disposed off.
3. In view of the disposal of the writ petition, no further orders are required in the present contempt case. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:16.06.2026 NKA
HN, J C.C.No.1568_2011 104 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1568 of 2011 Date: 16.06.2026
NKA