APHC010594932011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3573] THURSDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4399/2011 Between: 1. ALLU NARASIMHA RAO,, S/O. SUBBARAYUDU CULTIVATION, R/O. D.NO. 52-3-18, SOMESWARA AGARAHARAM, PALAKOL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. YERASINGU RAMAYYA, S/O. BAPAYYA COFFE HOTEL, R/O. D.NO. 51-5-26, RAMARAOPET, PALAKOL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. YERASINGU MANGAMMA, W/O. RAMAYYA HUSBAND'S PROTECTION R/O. D.NO. 51-5-26, RAMARAOPET, PALAKOL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. YERASINGU SATYANARAYANA, S/O. RAMAYYA COFFEE HOTEL, R/O. D.NO. 51-5-26, RAMARAOPET, PALAKOL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. YERASINGU LAKSHMI PADMAVATHI, W/O. MURALI KRISHNA WEAVERS COLONY, R/O. D.NO. 51-5-26, RAMARAOPET, PALAKOL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. MEDAPATI RAMACHANDRA REDDY, S/O. RAJA REDDY R/O. D.NO. 6-75, BAZAR CENTER KAVITAM, PODUR MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DASARI S V V S V PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. P DURGA PRASAD 3 The Court made the following ORDER : On 17.04.2026, this Court passed the following order: “On 27.02.2026, it was represented on that day the sole petitioner died and necessary steps to bring the Legal Representatives of the deceased petitioner on record are to be taken. Accordingly, time was granted to file appropriate application and the matter was adjourned to 13.03.2026 to enable the learned counsel for the petitioner, to file appropriate application to bring the Legal Representatives. However, no steps were taken so far. Today, when the matter is called the learned counsel for the petitioner sought a adjournment to comply with the order dated 27.02.2026. Though the matter is listed under the caption "for dismissal" to give one more fair chance to the petitioner, the matter is adjourned. List the matter on 01.05.2026 under the same caption, as a last chance.” 2. Today, there is no representation for the petitioner and in spite of granting several opportunities to take steps to bring the legal representatives of the deceased sole petitioner, no steps have been taken. 3. In view of the above, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI Date: 07.05.2026 Dvs 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI 160 CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4399 OF 2011 Dt: 07.05.2026 Dvs