APHC010511752011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 448/2011 Between: 1. YANDRU SRIDHAR, S/O. VENKATAPATHI CULTIVATION, R/O. RANGAMPET VILLAGE AND MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 1. YANDRU VENNELA, W/o. Yandru Sridhar Housewife R/o. D.No Yendruvari Street, G. Medapadu, Samalkot Mandal, East Godavari District. Appeal Under Section_____against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2011(CMAMP 371 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 438 days in representing the above CMASR.No. 43803/2009 IA NO: 1 OF 2012(CMAMP 658 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances state in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the hearing of the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 448/2011 by fixing an early date and pass IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 448/2011 YANDRU SRIDHAR, S/O. VENKATAPATHI CULTIVATION, R/O. RANGAMPET VILLAGE AND MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT AND YANDRU VENNELA, W/o. Yandru Sridhar Housewife R/o. D.No Yendruvari Street, G. Medapadu, Samalkot Mandal, East Godavari ...RESPONDENT Appeal Under Section_____against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2011(CMAMP 371 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated idavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 438 days in representing the above CMASR.No. IA NO: 1 OF 2012(CMAMP 658 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances state in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the hearing of the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 448/2011 by fixing IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3572] THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 448/2011 YANDRU SRIDHAR, S/O. VENKATAPATHI CULTIVATION, R/O. RANGAMPET VILLAGE AND MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT YANDRU VENNELA, W/o. Yandru Sridhar Housewife R/o. D.No. 5-124, Yendruvari Street, G. Medapadu, Samalkot Mandal, East Godavari ...RESPONDENT Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated idavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 438 days in representing the above CMASR.No. Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the hearing of the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 448/2011 by fixing 2 RNT,J & BM,J C.M.A.No.448 of 2011 IA NO: 2 OF 2012(CMAMP 1351 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased permit the petitioner to serve the appeal summons to the respondent by way of substituted service of paper publication Counsel for the Appellant: 1. SRICHARAN TELAPROLU Counsel for the Respondent: 1. 3 RNT,J & BM,J C.M.A.No.448 of 2011 The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) This appeal has been filed by the appellant/husband, being aggrieved from the judgment and decree dated 15.10.2009 passed in O.P.No.84 of 2008 on the file of the III Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada. 2. On 17.02.2026, the following order was passed: “The husband is the appellant. His petition seeking divorce under Section 13(1a)(1b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, was dismissed. 2. Sri Sricharan Telaprolu, learned counsel appearing for the appellant, prays for time to obtain latest instructions, as the matter has been listed after long. 3. List after four weeks.” 3. Today, when the case is called, none appeared for the appellant. 4. The matter pertains to the year 2011 shown under the caption ‘old matters’. 5. In view of the above, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J ____________________ BALAJI MEDAMALLI, J Date: 16.04.2026 MDP