Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2011 DAILYLAW 1229 (AP)

B. Swami Reddy v. The A.P.State Agro Industries Development Corporation

CC/1189/2011 · 2026-04-05

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2011

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010551862011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1189/2011 Between: 1. B. SWAMI REDDY, S/O. B. NARAYANA REDDY BUSINESS R/O. D.NO. 1/59B, MAIN ROAD, PAMULAPADU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE A P STATE AGRO INDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, LIMITED, REP.BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR M/S. SAILAJA RAMAIAH (VC&MD) FLAT NO.504, 5TH FLOOR, HERMITAGE OFFICE COMPLEX,HILL FORT ROAD, HYDERABAD -500 004. 2. SRI R SRINIVASULU REGIONAL MANAGER, A.P.STATE AGRO INDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., ANANTHAPUR. 3. B NAGI REDDY THE MARKETING EXECUTIVE, A.P.STATE AGRO INDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., AGRO SERVICE CENTRE, R.S.ROAD, KURNOOL. 4. S VENKATESHWAR THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. J SIVA PRASAD, S/O. J. VEERAIAH R/O. YERRAGUDUR VILLAGE, PAMULAPADU MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 2 6. SRI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY DISTRICT MANAGER, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE SEED DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish them for willfully and deliberately flouting the orders passed in WP.No.24138/2010 dated 06.10.2010 passed by his Lordship Hon'ble Justice. Nooty Ramamohan Rao IA NO: 1 OF 2011(APPL 649 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to the petitioner to add the 6th respondent herein as party Respondent in the above contempt case in the interest of justice IA NO: 2 OF 2011(APPL 3933 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. J JANAKIRAMI REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. K SARVA BHOUMA RAO 2. BANDA PRASADA RAO(SC FOR TSAIDC) 3. B THIMOTHI 4. K UDAYA SRI 5. ELEVATED AS JUDGE The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1189 of 2011 ORDER:- The present contempt case has been filed for non-compliance of the order dated 06.10.2010 passed in W.P.No.24138 of 2010. 2. Sri J.Janakiram Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that in view of the subsequent events more so the Writ Petition No.24138 of 2010 itself was dismissed as infructuous on 22.10.2013. Hence, the petitioner is not inclined to pursue the present contempt case. 3. Accordingly, recording the said submission, the contempt case is closed. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 06.04.2026 RMR 4 81 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1189 of 2011 06.04.2026 W RMR