Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2010 DAILYLAW 939 (ORI)

SRIDHAR MISHRA v. M.D.,WESCO.

WP(C)/8481/2010 · 2026-07-13

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Writ Petition (Civil)body2010

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 8481 of 2010 Sridhar Mishra …. Petitioner Mr. S.B. Jena, Advocate -versus- MD, WESCO & Others …. Opposite Parties Mr. P.K. Mohanty, Sr. Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH Order No. ORDER 06.04.2023 12. I.A. No.4835 of 2023 & W.P.(C) No.8481 of 2010 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel that during the pendency of the Writ Petition, the status of the Opposite Parties has changed. Hence, for effective adjudication, the petitioner seeks for impleading the Opposite Parties as per the schedule. 3. The existing Opposite Parties to be substituted by Opposite Party Nos.1 to 3 in terms of the schedule. Consolidated cause title incorporating Opposite Party Nos.1 to 3 be filed by 17.04.2023. 4. Accordingly, the I.A. stands disposed of. 5. Learned counsel on record for the erstwhile WESCO submits that he has no instruction to appear on behalf of the newly substituted Opposite Parties. Hence, learned counsel for the petitioner is called upon to take notice by speed post. p. 2 6. Requisites for issuance of notice to newly impleaded Opposite Party Nos.1 to 3 be filed by 17.04.2023. 7. List this Writ Petition immediately after service of notice. (V. NARASINGH) Ayesha Judge