Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 15479 of 2010 Sankar Pr. Kar ..... Petitioner Mr. J.K. Rath, Sr. Adv. -versus- MD, OMFED & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. S.K. Mishra, Adv. CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 09.07.2026 Order No. 06 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Since it is fairly contended in the Bar that against the order of termination so issued under Annexure-6, Petitioner can raise his grievance before the Board of Management represented by the President of the Federation, on the oral prayer made by the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Petitioner, he is permitted to implead the Board of Management, OMFED, represented by the President as Opp. Party No.4 in Court. 3. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties. 4. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “Under the above circumstance, it is therefore humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be graciously pleased to issue a writ in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order by Page 2 of 2. quashing the order passed by the opposite party no.1 terminating the services of the petitioner vide Annexure-6 and by declaring that the petitioner is deemed to be continuing in his service with all consequential benefits. And this Hon’ble Court be further pleased to direct the opposite parties to consider the case of the petitioner for renewal of his engagement as the allegation made against him are not true. And for this act of kindness, the Petitioner shall as in duty bound ever pray;” 5. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No.4 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, against the order of termination within a period of three (3) weeks hence. 6. It is observed that if such representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No. 4 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No. 4 be communicated to the Petitioner. 7. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Jyoti