Page 1 of 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 15138 of 2010 Premanidhi Digal ..... Petitioner None -versus- State & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. P.K. Sahoo, ASC CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 03.07.2026 Order No. 04 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. None appeared for the Petitioner when the matter was called. 3. Considering the relief claimed with regard to order of termination issued in the year 1999 under Annexure-8 and the fact that by the time such a challenge was made, Petitioner had already attained the age of superannuation, this Court is of the view that the relief as claimed for, has become infructuous. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Sneha