Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.9063 of 2010
Tapan Kumar Sahoo
….
Petitioner Mr. J.K. Mohapatra, Adv.
-versus-
Chairman, UCO Bank and Others
….
Opp. Parties Mr. B.N. Udgata, Advocate
CORAM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Order No
ORDER 29.06.2026
06. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the Parties.
3. Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition with
the following prayer:-
“In the aforesaid circumstances, it is humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to admit this writ application, issue notice to the Opp. Parties to file their show-cause, call for the record from O.P. No.4 and if the Opp. Parties fail to file any show cause or file insufficient cause the writ petition may be allowed and the Ops are directed to absorb the petitioner under his institution on compassionate grounds taking into
consideration the genuine grievance, past services, under the rehabilitation assistance scheme.”
4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a detailed representation before Opp. Party No.2 by
enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of three weeks hence.
5. It is observed that if such a representation is filed within the aforesaid period, Opp. Party No.2 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by the Opp. Party No.2 be communicated to the petitioner within the aforesaid time period.
6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge Basudev