IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.22121 of 2010 Uchhaba Swain and Others …. Petitioners None -versus- Paradip Port Trust and Another …. Opposite Parties Mr. D.K. Patra, Adv. for O.P. No.1 Mr. S. Nayak, Advocate on behalf of Mr. S.K. Padhi, Sr. Adv. for O.P. No.2 CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No ORDER 22.06.2026 14. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode. 2. None appeared for the petitioners in spite of revised call. Heard Mr. D.K. Patra, learned counsel appearing for O.P. No.1 and Mr. S. Nayak, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. S.K. Padhi, learned Senior Counsel for O.P. No.2. 3. Considering the relief claimed, this Court is of the view that with efflux of time the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 4. In view of the same, the Writ Petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Basudev