Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 19504 of 2010 Dayasankar Ram ..... Petitioner Mr. A. Mohanty, Adv. on behalf of Mr. B. Nayak, Adv. -versus- Union of India & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. P.K. Parhi, DSGI Along with Mr. A. Mohanty, CGC CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 22.06.2026 Order No. 01 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties. 3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “It is therefore prayed that your Honour may graciously be pleased to issue notice to the opposite parties to show cause as to why the writ application should not be allowed and after hearing of both the parties the opposite parties may be directed to allow the Petitioner to cross efficiency bar in term of F.R-25 and to consider the case of the Petitioner for promotion to the next higher rank alongwith the all consequential And/or to pass such other order(s) and direction(s) as this Hon'ble Court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case. Page 2 of 2. And for this act of kindness the petitioner shall as in duty bound ever pray.” 4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No.3 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of three (3) weeks hence. 5. It is observed that if such representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No. 3 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No. 3 be communicated to the Petitioner. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Jyoti