HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 9069 of 2010 Court No. - 21 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. The matter was taken up in the revised list. However, none appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition, nor has any adjournment slip been moved. Learned counsel for the respondents is present. 2. In the absence of any effective representation, it appears that the cause of action has become stale and the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 4. In case the petitioners feel that the matter still survives, liberty is granted to them to move an application for recalling this order within six weeks from today. February 11, 2026 Sumit S Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : R.P. Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : Asgi (2009/2861), C.S.C., Mohammad Ali (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Smt. Nanhi Agarwal And Ors. .....Petitioner(s) Arbitrator/District Collector Jhansi And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUMIT SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad