IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 716 CWP-7309-2010 Date of Decision: 20.07.2026 RAJ PAL ... Petitioner VERSUS THE UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM & ORS. ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY. **** Present: Mr. Shvetanshu Goel, Advocate for Mr. J.K. Goel, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Prince Singh, Advocate for the respondents. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G., Haryana. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Prayer inter alia made in the present petition for quashing the office order dated 23.06.2008, Annexure P-3 ordering recovery from the petitioner might not be surviving due to efflux of time especially in wake of there being no interim order. 2. Disposed of accordingly, however, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived by demonstrating that the cause still subsists. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JULY 20, 2026. JUDGE Rajender Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.07.20 18:32 I am the author of this document