Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2010 DAILYLAW 3661 (PNJ)

GIAN SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR

CWP/15455/2013 · 2026-07-14

Sandeep Moudgil

body2010

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

202. IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT Gian Singh State of Punjab and CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J 1. of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the respondent No.1, dismissing the appeal o dated 02.02.2010 (Annexure P Rs.5,93,789/ 2. petitioner’s counsel since On 21.07.2025, IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of decision: 1 Versus State of Punjab and another CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL None for the petitioner. Mr. T.P.S. Walia, AAG, Punjab ----- SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J. (ORAL) The instant writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 06.01.2012 (Annexure P respondent No.1, dismissing the appeal of the petitioner against the order dated 02.02.2010 (Annexure P-5), whereby punishment of recovery of Rs.5,93,789/- i.e. 20% out of Rs.29,68,945/- The matter is being adjourned for want of presence of petitioner’s counsel since 12.09.2023, which continued On 21.07.2025, the following order was passed: “Mr. Munish Gupta, Advocate, of attorney on behalf of the petitioner, which is taken on record. He prays for time to prepare and address Adjourned to 12.11.2025.” IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CWP-15455-2013 Date of decision: 14.07.2026 …. Petitioner …. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Punjab. The instant writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari order dated 06.01.2012 (Annexure P-7), passed by f the petitioner against the order 5), whereby punishment of recovery of - has been imposed. The matter is being adjourned for want of presence of , which continued upto 27.01.2025. the following order was passed:- Mr. Munish Gupta, Advocate, appears and files power of attorney on behalf of the petitioner, which is taken on record. He prays for time to prepare and address arguments. Adjourned to 12.11.2025.” The instant writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari , passed by f the petitioner against the order 5), whereby punishment of recovery of The matter is being adjourned for want of presence of 27.01.2025. appears and files power of attorney on behalf of the petitioner, which is taken on SANJEEV KUMAR 2026.07.17 15:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-15455-2013 - 2 - However, on 12.11.2025, the case was again adjourned on the written request of learned counsel for the petitioner, for today. 3. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner either in person or through his counsel. 4. In view of above, this Court is of the view that with the efflux of time, the petitioner might have lost interest in pursuing the present case, which is pending since 2013. 5. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) JUDGE 14.07.2026 sanjeev Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No SANJEEV KUMAR 2026.07.17 15:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document