` 160 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Nirdosh Kumar State of Punjab CORAM: HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Akshay Chadha, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Addl. AG, Punjab. Mr. Dheeraj Jain, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Hitesh Kumar Sammi, Mr. Saurav Verma, Advocate for respondent No.4. ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, A.C.J. (Oral) CM-391-CWPIL Prayer in the application is for placing on record amended writ petition. For the reasons assigned in the application, the same is allowed. Amended writ petition is taken on record. CWP-PIL-152 1. This PIL has been filed by the petitioner primarily raising a grievance that in violation of the provisions of Regulation) Act, 2010 as well as other statutory provisions. Prayer is accordingly made to direct closure of these institutions and also IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-PIL Date of Decision: 0 Nirdosh Kumar Vs. State of Punjab and others HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Mr. Akshay Chadha, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Addl. AG, Punjab. Mr. Dheeraj Jain, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Hitesh Kumar Sammi, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr. Saurav Verma, Advocate for respondent No.4. *** ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, A.C.J. (Oral) CWPIL-2026 Prayer in the application is for placing on record amended writ For the reasons assigned in the application, the same is allowed. Amended writ petition is taken on record. 152-2026 (O&M) This PIL has been filed by the petitioner primarily raising a that private respondents No.7 and 8 in violation of the provisions of the Clinical Establishments (Registration and Regulation) Act, 2010 as well as other statutory provisions. Prayer is accordingly made to direct closure of these institutions and also IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH PIL-152-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 07.07.2026 …Petitioner …Respondents HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Mr. Akshay Chadha, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Addl. AG, Punjab. Mr. Dheeraj Jain, Sr. Advocate with Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr. Saurav Verma, Advocate for respondent No.4. ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, A.C.J. (Oral) Prayer in the application is for placing on record amended writ For the reasons assigned in the application, the same is allowed. This PIL has been filed by the petitioner primarily raising a private respondents No.7 and 8 are operating their establishments the Clinical Establishments (Registration and Regulation) Act, 2010 as well as other statutory provisions. Prayer is accordingly made to direct closure of these institutions and also constitute a Senior-Level Prayer in the application is for placing on record amended writ For the reasons assigned in the application, the same is allowed. This PIL has been filed by the petitioner primarily raising a ng their establishments the Clinical Establishments (Registration and Regulation) Act, 2010 as well as other statutory provisions. Prayer is accordingly Level RAJESH KUMAR 2026.07.09 15:09 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CWP-PIL-152-2026 (O&M) [2] Committee for scrutinizing the management of respondent No.7 and 8 – hospital. 2. We find from the perusal of the writ petition that no material establishing the petitioner’s credential has been brought on record. How the petitioner came to know of the alleged irregularities, or why the prayer in the writ petition is directed only against one medical institution remains unexplained. We, therefore, are not inclined to entertain the present writ petition filed in public interest, as we find the petitioner’s bona fide to be doubtful. 3. However, as various violations of statutory provisions have been alleged, it shall be open for the petitioner to approach the Chief Medical Officer, Ludhiana, who shall get the facts inquired into and shall take such action as may be warranted in accordance with law, after notice to the private respondents. 4. For the reasons recorded above, we are not inclined to entertain the present public interest litigation and the same is accordingly dismissed. 5. All pending misc. application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE (ROHIT KAPOOR) JUDGE 07.07.2026 rajesh 1. Whether speaking/reasoned? : Yes/No 2. Whether reportable? : Yes/No RAJESH KUMAR 2026.07.09 15:09 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.