IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR-1766-2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 26.07.2018 Seo Ram ..... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN PRESENT: None for the petitioner. Mr. AS Yadav, AAG, Haryana. RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Custody certificate of the petitioner filed by learned State counsel is taken on record. Office to tag the same at the appropriate place. Despite the case having been called twice, the petitioner has gone un-represented. Perusal of the file shows since 10.05.2016, this case has been taken up for hearing several times, but none has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, it can safely be presumed that the petitioner or his counsel is no more interested in pursuing the instant revision. Resultantly, this revision is dismissed for want of prosecution. July 26, 2018 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Rishu Kataria 2018.07.30 11:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document