124 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA RAKESH KUMAR` STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Rajeev Godara, Ms. Divya Godara, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Pritam Singh Saini, Advocate with Ms. Surbhi Rana, Advocate for respondent Mr. Abhinash Jain, DAG, Haryana HARKESH MANUJA For detailed 314-2010” titled as BOARD Versus Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 30.01.2026 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Date of Decision: RAKESH KUMAR` Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Rajeev Godara, Advocate and Ms. Divya Godara, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Pritam Singh Saini, Advocate with Ms. Surbhi Rana, Advocate for respondent-Market Committee, Rania. Mr. Abhinash Jain, DAG, Haryana **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) For detailed order, see order of even date passed in “ titled as “HARYANA STATE AGRICULTURAL MKTG. Versus INDRO AND ORS.” Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (HARKESH MANUJA) Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA-4813-2011(O&M) Date of Decision: January 30, 2026 .......Appellant ......Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Advocate and Ms. Divya Godara, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Pritam Singh Saini, Advocate with Market Committee, Rania. Mr. Abhinash Jain, DAG, Haryana. order, see order of even date passed in “RFA- “HARYANA STATE AGRICULTURAL MKTG. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No (O&M) January 30, 2026 - “HARYANA STATE AGRICULTURAL MKTG. TEJWINDER SINGH 2026.02.10 09:32 I agree to specified portions of this document