Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2010 DAILYLAW 3511 (PNJ)

PAWAN KUMAR v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRA-S/1483/2011 · 2026-04-10

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2010

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 358 Pawan Kumar State of Punjab CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present :- Ms. Mr. Sandeep Arora Dr. ( VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The present conviction and order of sentence dated 24.08.2010 passed by the Sessions Judge, Jalandhar in case bearing FIR No.82 dated 02.04.2009 registered under Sections 302, 308 of the Jalandhar, District Jalandhar, vide which the petitioner was convicted under Section 304 Part II undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 05 years with a fine of Rs.3,000/- and in de of 06 months. 2. Learned the appellant has already completed his period of sentence and that he is under instructions to not press the 3. In view of the above, the present pressed. 4. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. 10.04.2026 Sumit Gusain Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRA-S-1483 Date of decision: VERSUS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ . Anmol Thakur, Advocate and Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate for the Dr. (Ms.) Savi Nagpal, AAG, Punjab ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The present appeal has been preferred against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 24.08.2010 passed by the Sessions Judge, Jalandhar in case bearing FIR No.82 dated 02.04.2009 registered under Sections 302, 308 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 Jalandhar, District Jalandhar, vide which the petitioner was convicted under Part II of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 05 years with a fine of and in default thereof to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the the appellant has already completed his period of sentence and that he is under instructions to not press the present appeal any further. In view of the above, the present Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1483-SB-2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 10.04.2026 ...Appellant(s) ...Respondent(s) VINOD S. BHARDWAJ or the appellant. Ms.) Savi Nagpal, AAG, Punjab. appeal has been preferred against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 24.08.2010 passed by the Sessions Judge, Jalandhar in case bearing FIR No.82 dated 02.04.2009 registered under Indian Penal Code, 1860 at Police Station Sadar Jalandhar, District Jalandhar, vide which the petitioner was convicted under Indian Penal Code, 1860 and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 05 years with a fine of fault thereof to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that the appellant has already completed his period of sentence and that he is under present appeal any further. In view of the above, the present appeal is dismissed as not Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUDGE SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.04.15 11:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document