IN TH 105 Ankit Sing Vandita K Informatio Bhawan, S CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU violation o Division B India and petition wa petitioners employees attained fin regard to t the Tribuna will only be COCP-2010-2026 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.2010 o Date of decision it Singh Versus dita Kaul, Secretary, Ministry rmation Technology, Department of an, Sansad Marg, New Delhi and o AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. Manish Boora, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ravindra Pal Singh, Sr. Pa for the respondents-UOI. HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition tion of order dated 19.11.2025 (An Bench of this Court in CWP-2610 and others vs. Ankit Singh and an ion was disposed of with the direction ners are not pressed qua the reinst yees in view of the fact that the d finality qua the other similarly s to the grant of consequential bene ibunal is modified as agreed betwee ly be notional upto the date of reinst 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 2010 of 2026 (O & M) cision :-29.04.2026 …..Petitioner stry of Communication and ent of Posts, Headquarter, Dak and others …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA ocate , Sr. Panel Counsel ition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by a 26101-2024 titled as “Union of and another”, whereby the writ rection that “…as prayed for, the einstatement of the respondent- he similar issue has already rly situated employees but with benefits, reinstatement order of tween the parties that the same einstatement which will be done VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.29 17.54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document as underta this order the Writ C (Annexure Chandigarh Union of In relied upon B.N. Math refers to pa COCP-2010-2026 (O & M) ertaken, within a period of 12 week der….”. Learned counsel for the respo Writ Court order emanates from th exure P-2) passed by the Central digarh Bench in OP No.060/448/2021 n of India and others”. Learned coun d upon the judgment passed by this athur, General Manager and ano s to para 9 of the same, which reads as “9. No doubt the or merged with the order is the order passed in within the jurisdictio Tribunals Act, 1985 and jurisdiction to entertai respect of such ah ord Act. In fact in T. Sud-ha it has been held that th Court has been taken jurisdiction, power an decide the matter is co Act. Under Section 14 in the present petition f of the Tribunal. Theref the jurisdiction to enter under Article 215 of th keeping in view availab to the petitioner, it is a petitioner to seek his rem 2 weeks of the receipt of copy of respondents has pointed out that rom the order dated 10.4.2024 entral Administrative Tribunal, 8/2021 titled as “Ankit Singh vs. d counsel for the respondents has this Court in Tarlok Singh vs. another 2008(3) SCT 73 and ads as follows :- e order of the Tribunal stands der passed by this Court, but it d in a service matter falling iction of the Administrative 5 and thus, the Tribunal has the ertain the contempt petition in order under Section 17 of the hakar Prasad's case (supra), at the jurisdiction of the High aken away to the extent the r and authority to hear and is covered by Section 14 of the 14 of the Act, the issue raised ion falls within the juris-diction erefore, though this Court has entertain the contempt peti-tion f the Constitution of India, but ilability of forum under the Act t is appropriate to relegate the is remedy under the Act alone.” VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.29 17.54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document contempt p permitted t approach th the petition April 29, 2 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo COCP-2010-2026 (O & M) It is submitted that therefore, empt proceedings, if any, before the lea Learned counsel for the petiti itted to withdraw the present contem oach the appropriate form. Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn wi etitioner. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, , 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 3 efore, the petitioner ought to file the learned Tribunal. petitioner prays that he may be contempt petition with liberty to with the aforesaid liberty to if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.29 17.54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document