Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2010 DAILYLAW 291 (CHH)

RAM RATAN TANDEY v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH and ORS.

WPS/3176/2010 · 2026-02-16

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2010

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 3176 of 2010  Ram Ratan Tandey S/o Ram Bhajan Tandey, Village And Post Ukhar, Block Sarangarh, Distt.-Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of Women & Child Welfare, Govt. of CG, DKS Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Director, Women & Child Welfare Directorate, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. District Collector, Jashpur, Distt.-Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. 4. Project Officer, Child Development Project, Jashpur, Jashpur District, Chhattisgarh. ----Respondents For Petitioner : None. For Respondent/ State : Ms. Neeta Tulsani Thawani, P.L. Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 10.06.2024 1) None appears on behalf of the petitioner even when the case is taken up for hearing in the second round. 2) The petitioner has filed this petition seeking following reliefs: ‘(a) to set aside the punishment of recovery of an amount of Rs.3,04,206/- imposed by the District Collector, Jashpur in his order dated 6.1.2009 as also the order of the appellate authority’s order dated 12.1.2010 confirming the said order. (b) to issue a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent Bank to sell only so much portion of the land as would satisfy the loan with interest. 2 (c) To award cost of this petition. (d) To grant any other relief that this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.’ 3) Learned State counsel would submit that by efflux of time, this petition has become infructuous. 4) Taking into consideration the fact that there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nimmi