Dilwale 1 30-FA-933-10.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 30 FIRST APPEAL NO. 933 OF 2010 Exe Engineer Medium Project Division No.1 Dhule VERSUS Indrasing Sakatsing (died) Lrs Maharu Girase And Anr ... Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Tarde Vivek V. AGP for Respondent-State: Mr. S. N. Morampalle Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. A. B. Kale ... WITH X-OBJECTION (STAMP) NO. 5020 OF 2012 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 933 OF 2010 Indrasing Sakatsing (died) Lrs Maharu Girase VERSUS Exe Engineer Medium Project Division No.1 Dhule And Anr ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. A. B. Kale AGP for Respondent-State: Mr. S. N. Morampalle Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. Tarde Vivek V. …. CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 01.09.2026 PER COURT : 1. As the acquisition proceeding was initiated in the year 1999, appeal is being heard finally with the consent of learned counsel appearing for the respective parties. 2. By the present appeal, the appellant/acquiring body takes an exception to the judgment and award dated 19.12.2008 passed by the 2026:BHC-AUG:40743 Dilwale 2 30-FA-933-10.odt learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Dhule in LAR No. 430 of 2004, whereby enhanced compensation came to be granted to the claimants. 3. The lands of the claimants were acquired for the purpose of Wadi Shevadi Medium Project. The notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, “the Act”) was published on 02.09.1999 and award was passed on 30.10.1999. 4. Both counsel submit that present appeal can be disposed of in view of order passed by this Court in First Appeal No.2085/2017 with connected matters decided on 12.06.2025 arising out of same project i.e. Wadi Shevadi Medium Project. 5. As this Court has already decided the appeal arising out of same project, I am inclined to adopt the same view. The present appeal is disposed of in view of First Appeal No.2085/2017 with connected matters decided on 12.06.2025. Hence, I pass the following order: ORDER (I) The first appeal filed by the acquiring body is dismissed. (II) The cross objection filed by claimants is partly allowed. (III) The claimants are entitled to compensation @ Rs.4,00,000/- per H for irrigated land, Rs.2,00,000/- per H for dry land and Rs.1,00,000/- per H for pot kharab land as per the categorization of land made by the learned Reference Court. (IV) The claimants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits Dilwale 3 30-FA-933-10.odt along with interest from the date of award as per the law laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in the case of State of Maharashtra Vs. Kailas Shiva Rangari, 2016 (3) Mh.L.J. 457. (V) Rest of the impugned award stands confirmed. (VI) The impugned judgment and award is modified accordingly. (VII) Deficit Court fee be paid. (VIII) Pending Civil Applications, if any, are disposed of. [ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ] JUDGE