Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2010 DAILYLAW 1848 (BOM)

ASHOK MAHADEO KHOBRAGADE, SECTY., APANG VA NIRADHAR BAHUUDDESHIYA KALYANKARI SANSTHA AND ANR v. UNION OF INDIA THR. MEMBER SECTY.,

WP/2646/2010 · 2026-03-09

Nivedita Prakash Mehta, Shri Anil L Pansare

body2010

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

8.wp.2646.10 1/1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.2646 of 2010 Ashok Mahadeo Khobragade and another vs. Union of India, through Member Secretary, Rehabilitation Council of India, New Delhi =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Mr. N.D. Khamborkar, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. S.A. Chaudhari, Advocate for the Respondent sole. CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE & NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, JJ. DATE : 9 th MARCH, 2026. The learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that, because of subsequent developments, the present petition has rendered infructuous. 02. The statement is accepted. 03. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of as infructuous. (Nivedita P. Mehta, J.) (Anil L. Pansare, J.) *sandesh 2026:BHC-NAG:3943-DB