$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA 666/2010 ESS CEE CEE & ASSOCIATE INDIA PVT LTD .....Appellant Through: None. versus PARVEEN KAUR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Anurag Sahay, Advocate through Video Conferencing. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR O R D E R % 08.07.2026 1. The present Appeal has been under Section 96 and Order XLI Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against the Judgment and Decree dated 17.04.2010 seeking the following reliefs:- “ It is, therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to allow the aforesaid appeal and set-aside the impugned judgment and decree dated 17.4.2010 passed by Shri D.C Anand, Additional Dist. Judge, (North) - IV/Delhi in Suit No. 356/09 titled "Smt Parveen Kaur & others V M/s Ess Cee Cee and Associates Pvt. Ltd. & Ors." and dismiss the Suit filed by the Respondent No. 1 and 2 against the Appellant in terms of the prayer made by Appellant. Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deems fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case may also be granted in favour of the Appellant and against the Respondents.” 2. This Court notes that none has entered an appearance on behalf of the Appellant since 29.11.2024. Accordingly, vide Order dated 09.05.2025, a Court notice was directed to be issued to the Appellant This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/07/2026 at 15:45:09 through all permissible modes, including Speed Post. Despite the said Order, none has appeared on behalf of the Appellant. 3. It is also noted that the Court notice that was sent through ordinary process remained unserved, while the notice sent through Speed Post was returned with the endorsement that the addressee had refused to accept the same. 4. In view thereof, this Court is of the view that since none has been appearing on behalf of the Appellant and also the Speed Post notice has been refused, the Appellant may not be desirous of prosecuting the present Appeal. 5. Accordingly, the present Appeal along with pending application (s), if any, stands dismissed for non-prosecution. 6. It is noticed that the decretal amount had been deposited with this Court pursuant to the Order dated 16.11.2011. Since the present Appeal has been dismissed, the Registry is directed to release the decretal amount, along with accrued interest, if any, in favour of the successful Plaintiffs/Respondents, in accordance with law. 7. List before the learned Joint Registrar on 21.07.2026 for completion of the formalities relating to release of the decretal amount. HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J JULY 8, 2026/nd/jk/kv This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/07/2026 at 15:45:09