Date of reserved for judgment Date of pronouncement Date of uploading APHC010377902010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY, TWO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 116/2010 Between: 1. AMOLOJU RAMABRAHMAM SRINIVAS SANYASI RAO, S/O.SURYA PRAKASA RAO GOLDSMITH D.NO.22 VISAKHAPATNAM 1. SMT AMOLOJU NAGALAXMI, W/o. R.S.S.Rao @ Nanaji House wife D.No.22-23-8 C/o. Vedurparthy Chittibabu Bukka Veedhi Appeal under section________ against orders appeal by setting aside the Judgment of the learned Additional Family Court Judge, Visakhapatnam made in MC.No.261/2005 dated 25/02/2010 and pass such other order IA NO: 1 OF 2010 (FCAMP 293 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the impugned Judgment of the learned Additional 1 judgment : ----------- : 23.06.2026 : 02.07.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 116/2010 AMOLOJU RAMABRAHMAM SRINIVAS SANYASI RAO, S/O.SURYA PRAKASA RAO GOLDSMITH D.NO.22-18-7, BONDAVARI STREET ...APPELLANT AND SMT AMOLOJU NAGALAXMI, W/o. R.S.S.Rao @ Nanaji House wife 8 C/o. Vedurparthy Chittibabu Bukka Veedhi ...RESPONDENT Appeal under section________ against orders to allow the Family Court appeal by setting aside the Judgment of the learned Additional Family Court Judge, Visakhapatnam made in MC.No.261/2005 dated 25/02/2010 and pass (FCAMP 293 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circum in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the impugned Judgment of the learned Additional IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3587] TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 116/2010 AMOLOJU RAMABRAHMAM SRINIVAS SANYASI RAO, S/O.SURYA DAVARI STREET ...APPELLANT SMT AMOLOJU NAGALAXMI, W/o. R.S.S.Rao @ Nanaji House wife ...RESPONDENT to allow the Family Court appeal by setting aside the Judgment of the learned Additional Family Court Judge, Visakhapatnam made in MC.No.261/2005 dated 25/02/2010 and pass praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the impugned Judgment of the learned Additional 2 Family Court Judge, Visakhapatnam made in MC.No.261/2005 dated 25/02/2010 and pass such other order Counsel for the Appellant: 1. M V S SAI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent: 1. S V R SUBRAHMANYAM The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH & THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 116 / 2010 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice D. Ramesh) 1. Being aggrieved by the Common Order dated 25.02.2010 passed in M.C.No.261 of 2005 by the learned Judge, Additional Family Court, Visakhapatnam, whereby maintenance at the rate of Rs.3,000/- per month was awarded in favour of the respondent, the appellant has preferred the present appeal. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. It is further noted that the present appeal pertains to the grant of maintenance. 3. In view of the absence of representation on behalf of the appellant and the nature of the appeal, this Court is of the considered view that no useful purpose would be served in adjourning the matter any further. Accordingly, the present Family Court Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. 4. However, it is made clear that if the appellant has any grievance or instructions at a later stage, he shall be at liberty to file an appropriate application seeking restoration of the appeal, and if such application is filed, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law on its own merits. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 Interim orders, if any, granted earlier shall stand vacated, and all pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE D. RAMESH __________________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI Date: 23.06.2026 SAK Whether the order is: Speaking ☑ Reasoned Reportable Non-reportable ☑ 5 125 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH & THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 116 / 2010 Date: 23.06.2026 SAK