KONDETI NAMO SRINIVAS RAO, W.G.DISTRICT v. SMT. KONDENTI BHU LAKSHMI, W.G.DISTRICT
CMA/412/2010 · 2026-06-15
Balaji Medamalli, D Ramesh
body2010
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2010 DAILYLAW 1417 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2010 DAILYLAW 1417 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010412602010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3587] TUESDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 412/2010 Between:
1. KONDETI NAMO SRINIVAS RAO, W.G.DISTRICT, S/O SURYANARAYANA CYCLE MECHANIC PALAKOL, P.J.C.J.C., W.G.DISTRICT
...APPELLANT AND
1. SMT KONDENTI BHU LAKSHMI W G DISTRICT, W/o Namo Srinivas Private Employee H/o Meka Leela Krishna D.No. 33-3-16, 17th Ward, Achigantlapalem, P.J.C.J.C., W.G. District
...RESPONDENT Appeal Under Section_____against orders Counsel for the Appellant:
1. P DURGA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent:
1.
2
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 412/2010
ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice D.Ramesh)
1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed challenging the
order and decree dated 29.10.2010 passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Narsapur, West Godavari District, in H.M.O.P. No.73 of 2007.
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the appellant submits that, despite his efforts, he could not secure any instructions from the appellant in this appeal of the year 2010 and is therefore unable to prosecute the matter.
3. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant and as no instructions have been received from the appellant for a long time, this Court is satisfied that the appellant is not inclined to pursue the matter further.
4. Accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. However, liberty is granted to the appellant to file an appropriate application seeking revival/restoration of the
3
appeal, if any instructions are received subsequently. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
_______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH
_________________________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
Date: 16.06.2026 klk
4
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
162
C.M.A.No.412 of 2010
Dated: 16.06.2026
klk