APHC010150962010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 945 of 2010 Bench Sr.No:-50 [3506] Sri Villuri Satya Narasinga Rao ...Petitioner Vs. Sri Budha Satyanarayana, Correspondent, The A.M.A. Adinarayana Aided English Medium High School, anakapalle. ...Contemnor ********** Advocate for Petitioner: Mr.Ravi Teja Talaseela, learned counsel, representing Smt.A JAYANTHI Advocate for Contemnor: CORAM : SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN DATE : 8th May 2026 JUDGMENT: Sri Ravi Teja Talaseela, learned counsel, representing Smt.A. Jayanthi, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that after filing of the present Contempt Case, which arises on account of non- implementation of interim direction passed during the pendency of the writ petition, the very writ petition itself since came to be disposed of, and that the petitioner has also superannuated from service, the matter renders infructuous. 2 2. Recording the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Contempt Case is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending consideration, if any, in this case shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN cs