1 APHC010333152010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1321 OF 2010 Between: 1. Sri Swamy Hathiramjee Mutt,Tirupathi, rep by its Mahant, Holding Office at No.122, Gandhi Road, Tirupathi, Chittoor District ...Petitioner AND 1. Kelimela Chinna Gunamma alias Lakshmamma, W/o Late Kelimela Pedabba, aged about Occ: Agriculture 2. Kelimela Chengalrayulu, S/o Late Kelimela Pedabba, aged about 45 years, Occ: Agriculture 3. Kelimela Venkataiah, S/o Kelimela Peddabba, aged about 35 years, Occ: Agriculture 4. Yelakkayala Subramanyam, S/o Yelakkayala Sirraiah, aged about 45 years, Agriculture 5. Yelakkayala Chenglrayulu, S/o Yelakkayala Bhupaiah, aged about 53 years, Occ: Agriculture 6. Yelakkayala Chendra Mouli, S/o Yelakkayala Bhupaiah, aged about 45 years, Occ: Agriculture Respondent 1 to 6 are R/o Upparapalle Harijanawada, Thumalagunta Post, Tirupathi Rural Mandal, Chittoor District 2 7. The Endowments Department, rep. by the Commissioner, Endowments Department, Boggulakunta, Abids, Hyderabad 8. The Endowments Department, rep. by the Asst Commissioner, Chittoor District 9. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Mutyal Reddypalli Police Station, Tirupathi Rural Chittoor District. Respondents 7 to 9 are not necessary parties in this Contempt Case ...Respondents Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act for their willful and wanton disobedience of the orders of this Hon'ble Court passed in above WPMP No. 902 of 2009 in W.P. No. 18763 of 2007 dated 30/1/2009 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2010(APPL 778 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 80 days in representing the above matter and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: K R PRABHAKAR Counsel for the Respondents: VENKATESWARA RAO GUDAPATI The Court made the following order: 3 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE No.1321 OF 2010 ORDER: The instant contempt petition has been filed alleging violation of interim orders dated 30.01.2009 passed by this Court in W.P.M.P.No.902 of 2009 in W.P.No.18763 of 2007. 2. On 28.04.2026 this Court passed the following order: “No representation for the petitioner. On the other hand, Ms.S.Manaswi, learned counsel for unofficial respondent Nos.1 to 6 submits that the very writ petition No.18763 of 2007 is dismissed along with other connected writ petitions on 22.09.2017. However, so as to give opportunity to the petitioner, post on 29.04.2026 in the caption „for dismissal‟.” 3. Today, though the matter is listed under the caption of ‘for dismissal’, none appeared for the petitioner. 4. On the other hand, Ms.Manaswi, counsel representing Sri Venkateswara Rao Gudapati, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the main writ petition No.18763 of 2007 was dismissed on 22.09.2017. 4 5. In view of the above facts and circumstances, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J Date:29.04.2026 Rns 5 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE No.1321 of 2010 Date:29.04.2026 Rns