APHC010246602010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3545] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 358/2010 Between: 1. M/S BUSAM VENKATESWARULU AND OTHERS, VIZIANAGARAM., VIZIANAGARAM. ...APPELLANT AND 1. THE COMMISISONER OF INCOME TAX VISAKHAPATNAM, Visakhapatnam. A.P. ...RESPONDENT Appeal under section _______ against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2009(ITTAMP 232 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 171 days in representing the ITTA.SR.No.1898 of 2008 IA NO: 2 OF 2009(ITTAMP 233 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased dispense with filing of certified copy of order passed in ITA.No. 270/V/02 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam Bench, Visakhapatnam dated 8-2-2008 , this appeal willbe heard along with other appeal 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2015(ITTAMP 3365 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Appellant: 1. K NEERAJA Counsel for the Respondent: 1. ANUP KOUSHIK KARAVADI 2. K RAJI REDDY(SENIOR SC_ INCOME TAX DEPT) The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL No.358 of 2010 JUDGMENT:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand) None appeared on behalf of appellant on the last date of hearing. 2. Today, despite the matter being called twice, there is no representation on behalf of appellant, though the appeal had been listed under the caption “for Dismissal” and despite learned counsel for appellant being notified. 3. It appears that appellant is not interested in pursuing the matter any longer. 4. Appeal is accordingly dismissed in default and for non- prosecution. 5. Copy of this order be conveyed to the appellant at the given address. 6. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of accordingly. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND __________________________________ JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA Date: 29.04.2026 SA 4 111 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL No.358 of 2010 Date: 29.04.2026 SA