Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2010 DAILYLAW 1394 (AP)

Kharaguntla Miriyam, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

CRLA/143/2010 · 2026-04-22

B V L N Chakravarthi

Criminal Appealbody2010

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010230552010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 143/2010 Between: 1. KHARAGUNTLA MIRIYAM,, W/O LATE VICTOR, R/O H.NO. 5-97- 9, 6/13, BRODIPET, GUNTUR, ...APELLANT AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P., AT HYDERABAD. 2. VEMULA PRAVEEN KUMAR, R/O 6/13, BRODIPET, NEAR LEM HIGH SCHOOL, GUNTUR-2, 3. BANDLAMUDI SRIMANNARAYANA, S/O NAGESWARA RAO, R/O PALADUGU VILLAGE, MEDIKONDURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPODENT(S): Appeal under Section 372/374(2)/378(4) of Cr.P.C praying that the High Court may be pleased to to set-aside the orders made in CC.No. 1053 of 2007, dt. 02-09-2009 on the file of the Hon'ble V Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Guntur, Guntur District. IA NO: 1 OF 2009(CRLAMP 3032 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to this petitioner to file this appeal questioning the orders made in CC.No. 1053 of 2007, dt.02-09-2009, on the fileo f the Hon'ble V Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Guntur, Guntur District. Counsel for the Apellant: 1. S SATYANARAYANA MOORTHY Counsel for the Respodent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI CRIMINAL APPEAL No.143 of 2010 ORAL JUDGMENT: The present Criminal Appeal is filed by the appellant/complainant challenging the order of acquittal dated 02.09.2009 passed by the learned V Additional Junior Civil Judge, Guntur, whereby the accused were acquitted under Section 248(1) CrPC of the charges framed under Sections 420, 468, and 471 IPC. 2. Sri S. Satyanarayana Moorthy, learned counsel for the appellant/complainant, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Criminal Appeal, and the same is endorsed on the case bundle. 3. Sri A. Sai Rohit, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the 1st respondent–State, is present. 4. Permission is accorded. 5. Accordingly, the Criminal Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Criminal Appeal shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 23rd April, 2026 cbn 3 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI CRIMINAL APPEAL No: 143 OF 2010 23rd April, 2026 cbn