KARTHIKEYAN KULASEKARAN v. EASWARAN THILLAI ESWARI
CMA/2329/2009 · 2026-03-23
K Kumaresh Babu
Transfer Petitionbody2009
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2009 DAILYLAW 5942 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2009 DAILYLAW 5942 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CMA No. 2329 of 2009 __________ Page1 of 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU CMA No. 2329 of 2009 Karthikeyan Kulasekaran S/o M.Kulasekaran No.2 155-157 Cox Avenue Penrith Nsw 2750 Australia ..Appellant(s) Vs Easwaran Thillai Eswari W/o Karthikeyan At No.10 Bharathi Park Main Road Sai Baba Colony Coimbatore 641 011 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER:- Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act r/w. Order XLI of CPC against the decree and judgment dated 28.04.2009 made in HMOP No.1 of 2008 on the file of the Additional District Court-I, Erode. For Appellant(s): Mr.N.Manokaran For Respondent(s): Ms.Aiyshwarya S for M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates ------
JUDGMENT The present appeal had been filed challenging the order of the Additional District Court-I, Erode dismissing the HMOP filed by the appellant against the respondent on the grounds of desertion and cruelty. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CMA No. 2329 of 2009 __________ Page2 of 3
2. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the parties appeared through videoconferencing and were identified by their respective counsels. A Memo was filed by the respondent indicating that she has no objection in the Appeal being allowed and the marriage also be dissolved between the parties. However, the respondent would submit that such dissolution of marriage shall not be on the grounds that were raised by the appellant in the application and the appellant also has no objection to the same.
3. The appellant and the respondent were married in the year 2000 and their relationship became litigious from the year 2008, when the HMOP was filed, 17 years had gone by and now the respondent had also filed a Memo to walk-away from the marriage.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court exercising the power under Order XL1 Rule 33 of CPC grants a decree of divorce on mutual consent under Section 13B of the Family Courts Act.
5. In view of the above order, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal stands
disposed of. No costs. 23-03-2026 (1/2) Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No GBA https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CMA No. 2329 of 2009 __________ Page3 of 3 K.KUMARESH BABU, J. GBA To The Additional District Court-I, Erode. CMA No. 2329 of 2009 23-03-2026 (1/2) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis