Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2009 DAILYLAW 2411 (PNJ)

PURAN CHAND AND ORS. v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

CWP/2682/2009 · 2026-07-16

Amarinder Singh Grewal, Harsimran Singh Sethi

body2009

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

204 PURAN CHAND AND OTHERS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: Present: HARSIMRAN SINGH 1. petitioners is for setting aside the action of the respondents vide which they have prepared the combined Seniority List of Junior Engineer (Civil) and Junior Engineer (Mechan Mechanical Regular Staff who qualified the Departmental Exami for the post of Junior Engineer Annexure P IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.2682 of 2009(O&M) Date of Decision : PURAN CHAND AND OTHERS VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Mr. D.S Patwalia, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Gaurav Rana, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG Punjab. Mr. Sanjay Kaushal, Senior Advocate with Mr. A.P.Setia, Advocate for the added respondents No.8 to 38, 44 to 47. Mr. K.S. Kahlon, Advocate in CM *** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) In the present petition, the grievance being raised by the petitioners is for setting aside the action of the respondents vide which they have prepared the combined Seniority List of Junior Engineer (Civil) and Junior Engineer (Mechanical), and the combined Seniority List of Civil and Mechanical Regular Staff who qualified the Departmental Exami for the post of Junior Engineer, a copy of which has been appended as Annexure P-3. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.2682 of 2009(O&M) Date of Decision : 16.07.2026 ........Petitioners VERSUS ........Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL D.S Patwalia, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Gaurav Rana, Advocate Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG Punjab. Mr. Sanjay Kaushal, Senior Advocate with or the added respondents No.8 to 38, 44 to 47. in CM-14932-CWP-2016 SETHI, J. (Oral) n the present petition, the grievance being raised by the petitioners is for setting aside the action of the respondents vide which they have prepared the combined Seniority List of Junior Engineer (Civil) and ical), and the combined Seniority List of Civil and Mechanical Regular Staff who qualified the Departmental Examination Test , a copy of which has been appended as n the present petition, the grievance being raised by the petitioners is for setting aside the action of the respondents vide which they have prepared the combined Seniority List of Junior Engineer (Civil) and ical), and the combined Seniority List of Civil and nation Test , a copy of which has been appended as SAPNA GOYAL 2026.07.20 15:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP No.2682 of 2009(O&M) -2- 2. Learned counsel for the parties submit that, in view of the reply filed with regard to the prayer raised in the present petition, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and may kindly be disposed of as such. 3. Ordered accordingly. 4. Pending application(s), including impleading as applicant, if any, shall stand disposed of. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE 16-07-2026 Sapna Goyal (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/ reasoned: YES Whether reportable: NO SAPNA GOYAL 2026.07.20 15:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document